PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABIG vs. NRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABIG vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABIG achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.


ABIG

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.31%
YTD
6.46%
6M
5.47%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NRSH

1D
0.51%
1M
13.93%
YTD
47.92%
6M
46.01%
1Y
58.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABIG vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ABIG and NRSH is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2025

0.69

The correlation between ABIG and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABIG vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABIG
ABIG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ABIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABIG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ABIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

NRSH
NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABIG vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABIGNRSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.40

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

5.40

-4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

16.86

-12.03

ABIG vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABIG and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABIGNRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.42

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.48

1.11

+0.37

Drawdowns

ABIG vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABIG drawdown since its inception was -13.70%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABIG and NRSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABIGNRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.70%

-24.01%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-10.94%

-2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

0.00%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-5.62%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.80%

3.50%

+0.30%

Volatility

ABIG vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Argent Large Cap ETF (ABIG) is 3.39%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that ABIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABIGNRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

9.21%

-5.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

20.27%

-10.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

24.44%

-11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

21.54%

-7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

21.54%

-7.22%

ABIG vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABIG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABIG vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

ABIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than NRSH's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ABIG
Argent Large Cap ETF
0.09%0.10%0.00%0.00%
NRSH
Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF
0.28%0.42%0.90%0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABIG and NRSH have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to ABIG (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABIG dropped -13.70% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 18.30% for ABIG. On fees, ABIG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ABIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 18.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABIG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.09% for ABIG.

They also come from different issuers: Argent and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ABIG and 0.75% for NRSH.

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABIG and NRSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer