ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC
ABI.BR (Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV) and GRF.MC (Grifols S.A) are both stocks. ABI.BR operates in Beverages - Brewers (Consumer Defensive), while GRF.MC operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, ABI.BR returned -2.71%/yr vs -6.31%/yr for GRF.MC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABI.BR achieves a 31.71% return, which is significantly higher than GRF.MC's -15.61% return. Over the past 10 years, ABI.BR has outperformed GRF.MC with an annualized return of -2.71%, while GRF.MC has yielded a comparatively lower -6.31% annualized return.
ABI.BR
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 31.71%
- 6M
- 33.56%
- 1Y
- 17.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- -2.71%
GRF.MC
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -15.61%
- 6M
- -16.31%
- 1Y
- -10.43%
- 3Y*
- -6.20%
- 5Y*
- -17.76%
- 10Y*
- -6.31%
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABI.BR Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 31.71% | 15.49% | -16.55% | 4.76% | 6.52% | -6.18% | -21.05% | 28.14% | -36.47% | -5.05% |
GRF.MC Grifols S.A | -15.61% | 18.31% | -40.82% | 43.55% | -36.20% | -28.14% | -23.53% | 38.98% | -4.73% | 31.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABI.BR and GRF.MC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2006 | 0.26 |
The correlation between ABI.BR and GRF.MC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC — Risk / Return Rank
ABI.BR
GRF.MC
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (ABI.BR) and Grifols S.A (GRF.MC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABI.BR | GRF.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.95 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.38 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | -0.65 | +2.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABI.BR drawdown since its inception was -75.36%, smaller than the maximum GRF.MC drawdown of -79.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABI.BR and GRF.MC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABI.BR | GRF.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.36% | -79.35% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.08% | -35.12% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.46% | -55.37% | +27.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.23% | -71.11% | +41.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.79% | -79.35% | +7.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.15% | -72.66% | +40.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.01% | -27.37% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.24% | 20.48% | -9.24% |
Volatility
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (ABI.BR) is 6.52%, while Grifols S.A (GRF.MC) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that ABI.BR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRF.MC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABI.BR | GRF.MC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 7.50% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.94% | 22.81% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 30.74% | -5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.37% | 48.10% | -24.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 38.88% | -11.59% |
Dividends
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Dividend Comparison
ABI.BR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than GRF.MC's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABI.BR Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 1.61% | 1.55% | 1.19% | 0.90% | 0.62% | 0.66% | 0.61% | 1.73% | 3.40% | 2.71% | 2.61% | 2.33% |
GRF.MC Grifols S.A | 1.66% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.16% | 0.68% | 1.10% | 1.76% | 1.29% | 1.66% | 3.03% |
Financials
ABI.BR vs. GRF.MC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and Grifols S.A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABI.BR and GRF.MC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ABI.BR and GRF.MC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer