ABEMX vs. THQ
Compare and contrast key facts about abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ).
ABEMX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on May 10, 2007. THQ is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jul 29, 2014.
Performance
ABEMX vs. THQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABEMX vs. THQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund | 0.00% | 32.43% | 3.98% | 6.67% | -26.23% | 7.15% | 27.65% | 20.42% | -14.65% | 30.25% |
THQ Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund | -9.62% | 13.88% | 15.51% | -1.62% | -17.53% | 33.39% | 15.20% | 22.70% | 3.41% | 21.84% |
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, ABEMX has underperformed THQ with an annualized return of 7.45%, while THQ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.83% annualized return.
ABEMX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.29%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 7.45%
THQ
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -11.99%
- YTD
- -9.62%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- -8.31%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABEMX vs. THQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABEMX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than THQ's 1.47% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABEMX vs. THQ — Risk / Return Rank
ABEMX
THQ
ABEMX vs. THQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABEMX | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | -0.39 | +2.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | -0.40 | +2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.95 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.33 | +2.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | -0.78 | +9.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABEMX | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | -0.39 | +2.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.18 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.43 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.33 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEMX and THQ is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ABEMX vs. THQ - Dividend Comparison
ABEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, less than THQ's 12.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEMX abrdn Emerging Markets Fund | 6.11% | 6.11% | 0.99% | 1.42% | 1.82% | 22.95% | 0.68% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 2.47% |
THQ Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund | 12.86% | 11.29% | 11.09% | 7.45% | 6.81% | 5.27% | 6.62% | 7.08% | 8.05% | 7.71% | 8.70% | 9.50% |
Drawdowns
ABEMX vs. THQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEMX drawdown since its inception was -54.52%, which is greater than THQ's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEMX and THQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEMX | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.52% | -39.35% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -22.11% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.56% | -32.20% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.44% | -39.35% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | -14.45% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.20% | -8.66% | -4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 9.61% | -6.33% |
Volatility
ABEMX vs. THQ - Volatility Comparison
abrdn Emerging Markets Fund (ABEMX) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) at 5.90%. This indicates that ABEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABEMX | THQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.17% | 5.90% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 12.38% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.22% | 21.64% | -3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 18.79% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 20.46% | -2.05% |