PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABEC.DE vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Alphabet Inc (ABEC.DE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ABEC.DE is traded in EUR, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABEC.DE achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 12.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ABEC.DE has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 25.94%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.90% annualized return.


ABEC.DE

1D
3.00%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
18.14%
6M
14.61%
1Y
111.39%
3Y*
38.60%
5Y*
25.88%
10Y*
25.94%

NVDA

1D
-5.45%
1M
0.75%
YTD
12.27%
6M
13.76%
1Y
45.74%
3Y*
70.26%
5Y*
65.36%
10Y*
67.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABEC.DE
Alphabet Inc
18.14%45.94%44.38%55.12%-36.45%80.52%18.89%32.16%4.32%17.95%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.27%22.43%189.15%228.85%-47.18%142.35%103.97%80.94%-27.57%59.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ABEC.DE and NVDA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABEC.DE
ABEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ABEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc (ABEC.DE) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABEC.DENVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.23

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.42

2.33

+4.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.34

5.11

+16.23

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABEC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.19, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABEC.DE and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABEC.DENVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.19

1.30

+2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

1.28

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

1.36

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.75

+0.14

Drawdowns

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABEC.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.74%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEC.DE and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABEC.DENVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.74%

-82.97%

+44.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.78%

-19.76%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.46%

-41.46%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

-60.91%

+22.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.74%

-60.91%

+22.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.12%

-11.76%

+3.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-31.86%

+23.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.36%

8.98%

-3.62%

Volatility

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alphabet Inc (ABEC.DE) is 7.54%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that ABEC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABEC.DENVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

12.75%

-5.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

26.05%

-8.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.26%

35.39%

-8.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.38%

51.15%

-21.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

49.93%

-22.51%

Dividends

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

ABEC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABEC.DE
Alphabet Inc
0.20%0.23%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

ABEC.DE vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alphabet Inc and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ABEC.DE values in EUR, NVDA values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ABEC.DE and NVDA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABEC.DE and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer