ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE
ABEA.DE (Alphabet Inc. Class A) is a stock, while LSMC.DE (Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. Over the past 3 years, ABEA.DE returned 41.82%/yr vs 58.94%/yr for LSMC.DE. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABEA.DE achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 58.81% return.
ABEA.DE
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 89.96%
- 3Y*
- 41.82%
- 5Y*
- 23.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.12%
LSMC.DE
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -8.78%
- 6M
- 49.10%
- YTD
- 58.81%
- 1Y
- 95.12%
- 3Y*
- 58.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.76%
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEA.DE Alphabet Inc. Class A | 15.00% | 46.64% | 44.40% | 54.77% | -36.91% | -0.95% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 58.81% | 32.60% | 66.51% | 74.52% | -34.67% | -0.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABEA.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ABEA.DE and LSMC.DE has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ABEA.DE
LSMC.DE
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet Inc. Class A (ABEA.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.40 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 6.09 | -0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.69 | 19.29 | -4.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.53%, which is greater than LSMC.DE's maximum drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABEA.DE and LSMC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.53% | -39.64% | -19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -15.54% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.71% | -36.22% | +2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -10.70% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -11.33% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | 4.91% | +1.20% |
Volatility
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alphabet Inc. Class A (ABEA.DE) is 10.97%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that ABEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABEA.DE | LSMC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.97% | 14.45% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.45% | 26.62% | -5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.71% | 34.01% | -4.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 32.76% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.96% | 32.76% | -4.80% |
Dividends
ABEA.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison
ABEA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, while LSMC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ABEA.DE Alphabet Inc. Class A | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.30% |
LSMC.DE Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABEA.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ABEA.DE and LSMC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer