PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCVX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund (ABCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, ABCVX has underperformed FALGX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while FALGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.52% annualized return.


ABCVX

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.88%
YTD
13.67%
6M
12.57%
1Y
19.79%
3Y*
14.78%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
10.55%

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
9.14%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
13.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABCVX
American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund
13.67%13.88%11.65%5.13%-12.49%25.59%8.31%27.90%-3.68%14.07%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%19.09%18.68%22.88%-8.40%25.20%8.27%31.01%-8.88%16.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCVX and FALGX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2012

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between ABCVX and FALGX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABCVX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCVX
ABCVX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ABCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund (ABCVX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABCVXFALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.34

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

3.77

+5.99

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCVX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCVX drawdown since its inception was -33.29%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCVX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCVXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.29%

-64.07%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.20%

-5.06%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.25%

-21.78%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.75%

-21.78%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.29%

-37.58%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-4.20%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.00%

-14.41%

+10.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.93%

-0.84%

Volatility

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund (ABCVX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that ABCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABCVXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

0.00%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.85%

3.52%

+5.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.08%

7.83%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

16.61%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.86%

18.60%

-1.74%

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABCVX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

ABCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.80%, more than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABCVX
American Beacon The London Company Income Equity Fund
14.80%16.78%13.22%2.46%3.87%1.74%2.54%8.01%3.80%1.68%2.36%1.92%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABCVX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABCVX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCVX dropped -33.29% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

ABCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABCVX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer