PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCS vs. USMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABCS vs. USMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a 8.48% return, which is significantly higher than USMF's 4.51% return.


ABCS

1D
0.41%
1M
2.41%
YTD
8.48%
6M
7.66%
1Y
17.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USMF

1D
-1.81%
1M
0.79%
YTD
4.51%
6M
3.57%
1Y
6.87%
3Y*
13.86%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCS vs. USMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
8.48%7.95%14.47%-0.06%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
4.51%4.60%19.65%0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCS and USMF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023

0.84

The correlation between ABCS and USMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

ABCS vs. USMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ABCS
USMF

Financial Services

20.5%
10.7%

Healthcare

15.2%
9.0%

Technology

15.0%
33.2%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
10.5%

Industrials

11.1%
8.2%

Energy

6.3%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

4.4%
2.0%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.9%

Utilities

3.4%
1.9%

Communication Services

2.1%
9.8%

Financial Services

ABCS
20.5%
USMF
10.7%

Healthcare

ABCS
15.2%
USMF
9.0%

Technology

ABCS
15.0%
USMF
33.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ABCS
13.6%
USMF
10.5%

Industrials

ABCS
11.1%
USMF
8.2%

Energy

ABCS
6.3%
USMF
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

ABCS
5.0%
USMF
4.3%

Real Estate

ABCS
4.4%
USMF
2.0%

Basic Materials

ABCS
3.5%
USMF
0.9%

Utilities

ABCS
3.4%
USMF
1.9%

Communication Services

ABCS
2.1%
USMF
9.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABCS vs. USMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCS
ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

USMF
USMF Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
USMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMF Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
USMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMF Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCS vs. USMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABCSUSMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.07

+1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

3.16

+3.61

ABCS vs. USMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the USMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCS and USMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABCS vs. USMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum USMF drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and USMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCSUSMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.52%

-36.24%

+15.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-6.47%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-2.01%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.47%

-4.14%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.18%

+0.46%

Volatility

ABCS vs. USMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is 3.31%, while WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund (USMF) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that ABCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABCSUSMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.95%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.37%

8.55%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

11.56%

+2.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.06%

14.35%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

16.98%

+0.08%

ABCS vs. USMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than USMF's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABCS vs. USMF - Dividend Comparison

ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than USMF's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABCS
Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF
1.24%1.37%1.39%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USMF
WisdomTree US Multifactor Fund
1.31%1.37%1.22%1.33%1.74%1.42%1.34%1.38%1.45%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABCS and USMF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USMF has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to ABCS (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCS dropped -20.52% vs USMF's -36.24%.

On 1-year performance, ABCS leads with 17.88% vs 6.87% for USMF. On fees, ABCS is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ABCS has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 6.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ABCS is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for USMF.

USMF has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.24% for ABCS.

ABCS tracks BNY Mellon ABC Index, while USMF tracks WisdomTree US Multifactor Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ABCS and 0.28% for USMF.

ABCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABCS and USMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer