ABCL vs. MRK
Compare and contrast key facts about AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK).
Performance
ABCL vs. MRK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABCL vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCL AbCellera Biologics Inc. | 2.05% | 16.72% | -48.69% | -43.63% | -29.16% | -64.46% | -31.68% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 15.13% | 9.79% | -6.26% | 1.01% | 49.42% | 1.75% | -0.62% |
Fundamentals
ABCL:
$1.04B
MRK:
$299.28B
ABCL:
-$0.49
MRK:
$7.30
ABCL:
13.88
MRK:
4.63
ABCL:
1.08
MRK:
5.77
ABCL:
$75.13M
MRK:
$65.01B
ABCL:
-$36.22M
MRK:
$52.98B
ABCL:
-$126.64M
MRK:
$28.80B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABCL achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than MRK's 15.13% return.
ABCL
- 1D
- 6.40%
- 1M
- -3.32%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- -30.62%
- 1Y
- 56.50%
- 3Y*
- -22.65%
- 5Y*
- -35.27%
- 10Y*
- —
MRK
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- 15.13%
- 6M
- 45.62%
- 1Y
- 38.88%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABCL vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank
ABCL
MRK
ABCL vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.34 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.96 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.25 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.19 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 5.34 | -3.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.34 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 | 0.60 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 0.49 | -1.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABCL and MRK is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ABCL vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison
ABCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCL AbCellera Biologics Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 2.76% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
ABCL vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABCL drawdown since its inception was -96.72%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCL and MRK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.72% | -68.61% | -28.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.94% | -15.67% | -39.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.35% | -43.44% | -50.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.07% | -4.04% | -90.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.30% | -18.89% | -64.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.87% | 7.44% | +20.43% |
Volatility
ABCL vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison
AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) at 5.85%. This indicates that ABCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.03% | 5.85% | +6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.26% | 19.79% | +33.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.17% | 29.08% | +49.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.57% | 23.30% | +43.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.65% | 22.68% | +46.97% |
Financials
ABCL vs. MRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbCellera Biologics Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities