ABCL vs. MRK
ABCL (AbCellera Biologics Inc.) and MRK (Merck & Co., Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — ABCL in Biotechnology, MRK in Drug Manufacturers - General. Over the past 5 years, ABCL returned -26.11%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for MRK. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABCL vs. MRK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABCL achieves a 67.25% return, which is significantly higher than MRK's 9.78% return.
ABCL
- 1D
- -6.69%
- 1M
- 24.62%
- YTD
- 67.25%
- 6M
- 63.90%
- 1Y
- 147.62%
- 3Y*
- -5.56%
- 5Y*
- -26.11%
- 10Y*
- —
MRK
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- 1Y
- 54.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
ABCL vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCL AbCellera Biologics Inc. | 67.25% | 16.72% | -48.69% | -43.63% | -29.16% | -64.46% | -31.68% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 9.78% | 9.79% | -6.26% | 1.01% | 49.42% | 1.75% | -0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABCL and MRK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ABCL:
$1.73B
MRK:
$283.54B
ABCL:
-$0.48
MRK:
$3.58
ABCL:
21.65
MRK:
4.36
ABCL:
1.85
MRK:
6.18
ABCL:
$79.21M
MRK:
$65.59B
ABCL:
$70.89M
MRK:
$49.79B
ABCL:
-$166.07M
MRK:
$22.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABCL vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank
ABCL
MRK
ABCL vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.88 | 2.02 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 2.94 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 4.78 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 12.00 | -7.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.02 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.54 | -0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.48 | -0.98 |
Drawdowns
ABCL vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABCL drawdown since its inception was -96.72%, which is greater than MRK's maximum drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCL and MRK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.72% | -68.61% | -28.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.94% | -11.37% | -43.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.72% | -43.44% | -32.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.64% | -43.44% | -49.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.29% | -8.50% | -81.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.59% | -18.84% | -64.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.01% | 4.52% | +25.49% |
Volatility
ABCL vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison
AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) has a higher volatility of 28.65% compared to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) at 8.21%. This indicates that ABCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABCL | MRK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.65% | 8.21% | +20.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.34% | 17.62% | +34.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.56% | 26.92% | +52.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.48% | 23.62% | +42.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.07% | 22.91% | +47.16% |
Dividends
ABCL vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison
ABCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCL AbCellera Biologics Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 2.89% | 3.12% | 3.14% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 3.41% | 3.03% | 2.48% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 3.14% | 3.43% |
Financials
ABCL vs. MRK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbCellera Biologics Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABCL and MRK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABCL has higher volatility (28.65%) compared to MRK (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCL dropped -96.72% vs MRK's -68.61%.
MRK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABCL and MRK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer