ABBV vs. CPER
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) is a stock, while CPER (United States Copper Index Fund) is Metals fund tracking the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 18.63%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for CPER. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. CPER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than CPER's 10.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has outperformed CPER with an annualized return of 18.63%, while CPER has yielded a comparatively lower 11.08% annualized return.
ABBV
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
CPER
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 10.27%
- 6M
- 15.97%
- 1Y
- 27.52%
- 3Y*
- 18.31%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
ABBV vs. CPER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | -0.77% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 10.27% | 38.95% | 4.23% | 4.55% | -15.14% | 25.21% | 23.90% | 6.66% | -21.91% | 28.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and CPER is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.10 |
The correlation between ABBV and CPER shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. CPER — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
CPER
ABBV vs. CPER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and United States Copper Index Fund (CPER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABBV | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 2.31 | +0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABBV | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 0.80 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.25 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.46 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.13 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. CPER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum CPER drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and CPER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -54.04% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -24.77% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -24.77% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -34.75% | +12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -38.42% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -5.05% | -1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -25.39% | +14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 11.94% | -4.22% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. CPER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is 6.39%, while United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) has a volatility of 10.22%. This indicates that ABBV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CPER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 10.22% | -3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.89% | 23.14% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.33% | 34.78% | -10.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 27.04% | -4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 24.07% | +1.67% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. CPER - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, while CPER has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.02% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and CPER have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CPER has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to ABBV (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs CPER's -54.04%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and CPER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer