AASOX vs. FGROX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AASOX (Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio) and FGROX (Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AASOX returned 8.71%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for FGROX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AASOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for FGROX.

Performance

AASOX vs. FGROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASOX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than FGROX's 26.22% return. Over the past 10 years, AASOX has underperformed FGROX with an annualized return of 8.71%, while FGROX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.

AASOX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 5.84%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 7.42%
• 1Y: 27.83%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: -2.53%
• 10Y*: 8.71%

FGROX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 6M: 24.64%
• 1Y: 68.45%
• 3Y*: 29.82%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: 15.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASOX vs. FGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AASOX Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio	9.87%	5.89%	8.12%	16.49%	-38.39%	-5.07%	67.18%	29.36%	1.47%	28.73%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	26.22%	31.85%	20.04%	19.04%	-24.42%	3.91%	38.92%	28.71%	-11.85%	28.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AASOX and FGROX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2008	0.92

The correlation between AASOX and FGROX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AASOX vs. FGROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASOX

AASOX Risk / Return Rank: 21
AASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
AASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

FGROX

FGROX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FGROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FGROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FGROX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
FGROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FGROX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASOX vs. FGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AASOX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.90	-1.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	3.57	-1.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.45	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	5.11	-3.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.40	21.59	-16.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AASOX vs. FGROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the FGROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASOX and FGROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AASOX	FGROX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.34	2.90	-1.56
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.06	0.50	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.63	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.52	-0.29

Drawdowns

AASOX vs. FGROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASOX drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, which is greater than FGROX's maximum drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASOX and FGROX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AASOX	FGROX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.54%	-41.48%	-33.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.34%	-14.36%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.82%	-28.61%	-4.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.50%	-38.52%	-21.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.50%	-41.48%	-19.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.53%	0.00%	-37.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.84%	-10.25%	-19.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.51%	3.38%	+2.13%

Volatility

AASOX vs. FGROX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class (FGROX) have volatilities of 7.30% and 7.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AASOX	FGROX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.30%	7.62%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.40%	19.27%	-1.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.25%	25.34%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.35%	25.58%	+14.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.44%	25.18%	+8.26%

AASOX vs. FGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FGROX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

AASOX vs. FGROX - Dividend Comparison

AASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than FGROX's 9.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AASOX Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio	1.07%	1.17%	0.38%	0.00%	22.43%	49.73%	6.88%	5.59%	4.58%
FGROX Emerald Growth Fund Institutional Class	9.02%	11.39%	13.92%	5.91%	8.13%	17.87%	8.04%	1.38%	11.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AASOX and FGROX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, AASOX and FGROX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AASOX or FGROX?

FGROX has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to AASOX (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASOX dropped -74.54% vs FGROX's -41.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGROX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.