PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASOX vs. CTSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASOX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than CTSIX's 35.59% return.


AASOX

1D
0.34%
1M
5.84%
YTD
9.87%
6M
7.42%
1Y
27.83%
3Y*
11.01%
5Y*
-2.53%
10Y*
8.71%

CTSIX

1D
2.87%
1M
11.15%
YTD
35.59%
6M
35.33%
1Y
68.24%
3Y*
35.13%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
9.87%5.89%8.12%16.49%-38.39%-5.07%67.18%2.36%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
35.59%25.90%44.34%7.57%-37.30%9.12%63.38%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between AASOX and CTSIX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2019

0.89

The correlation between AASOX and CTSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASOX vs. CTSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASOX
AASOX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

CTSIX
CTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
CTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AASOXCTSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

5.65

-4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

23.22

-17.82

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the CTSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASOX and CTSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AASOXCTSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.52

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

0.40

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.57

-0.35

Drawdowns

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASOX drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, which is greater than CTSIX's maximum drawdown of -50.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASOX and CTSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASOXCTSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.54%

-50.83%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.34%

-12.38%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-28.40%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.50%

-50.60%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.53%

0.00%

-37.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.84%

-20.64%

-9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

3.00%

+2.51%

Volatility

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) is 7.30%, while Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund (CTSIX) has a volatility of 9.40%. This indicates that AASOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASOXCTSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.30%

9.40%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.40%

21.29%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.25%

27.70%

-5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.35%

28.00%

+12.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.44%

29.78%

+3.66%

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CTSIX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASOX vs. CTSIX - Dividend Comparison

AASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while CTSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
1.07%1.17%0.38%0.00%22.43%49.73%6.88%5.59%4.58%
CTSIX
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%2.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.77%4.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AASOX and CTSIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTSIX has higher volatility (9.40%) compared to AASOX (7.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASOX dropped -74.54% vs CTSIX's -50.83%.

CTSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASOX and CTSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer