AASMX vs. TSCSX
AASMX (Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund) and TSCSX (Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, AASMX returned 11.83%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for TSCSX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AASMX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for TSCSX.
Performance
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AASMX having a 17.26% return and TSCSX slightly higher at 17.35%. Over the past 10 years, AASMX has underperformed TSCSX with an annualized return of 11.83%, while TSCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
AASMX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
TSCSX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.07%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 17.26% | 2.13% | 13.02% | 12.20% | -11.24% | 23.82% | 22.48% | 27.55% | -10.77% | 11.70% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 17.35% | 2.36% | 12.73% | 12.47% | -10.94% | 24.22% | 22.87% | 27.92% | -10.52% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AASMX and TSCSX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 1997 | 1.00 |
The correlation between AASMX and TSCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AASMX vs. TSCSX — Risk / Return Rank
AASMX
TSCSX
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AASMX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 2.62 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 8.80 | -0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASMX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TSCSX drawdown of -56.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASMX and TSCSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASMX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -56.66% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -11.53% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.56% | -26.84% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -27.04% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | -41.63% | -0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -10.23% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.42% | +0.02% |
Volatility
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S (TSCSX) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AASMX | TSCSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.96% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.63% | 12.64% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 17.45% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 21.65% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 22.16% | +0.51% |
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCSX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
AASMX vs. TSCSX - Dividend Comparison
AASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than TSCSX's 2.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 2.68% | 3.14% | 4.21% | 0.42% | 12.87% | 14.74% | 1.83% | 10.84% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
TSCSX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund Class S | 2.01% | 2.36% | 3.18% | 0.46% | 9.60% | 11.33% | 1.60% | 8.72% | 15.00% | 6.68% | 4.19% | 8.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, AASMX and TSCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSCSX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to AASMX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASMX dropped -57.13% vs TSCSX's -56.66%.
TSCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AASMX and TSCSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer