AASG.L vs. XDJP.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) and XDJP.L (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - AASG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while XDJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AASG.L returned 68.82%/yr vs 11.24%/yr for XDJP.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AASG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.L.

Performance

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASG.L achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.L's 24.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AASG.L has outperformed XDJP.L with an annualized return of 68.82%, while XDJP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.

AASG.L

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -11.19%
• 6M: 11.74%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 68.82%

XDJP.L

• 1D: -2.67%
• 1M: -10.09%
• 6M: 16.93%
• YTD: 24.42%
• 1Y: 49.05%
• 3Y*: 19.66%
• 5Y*: 11.68%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	18.19%	23.83%	14.04%	0.69%	-11.51%	-4.50%	24.04%	14.10%	6,526.57%	42.10%
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D	24.42%	21.04%	9.68%	15.52%	-10.26%	-3.79%	21.77%	16.59%	-3.53%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AASG.L and XDJP.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013	0.50

Over the past year, AASG.L and XDJP.L have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AASG.L	XDJP.L
Technology	52.0%	33.3%
Financial Services	13.1%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	16.6%
Industrials	6.9%	18.2%
Communication Services	6.1%	14.3%
Basic Materials	3.3%	4.1%
Healthcare	2.8%	6.1%
Energy	2.4%	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	2.9%
Utilities	1.3%	0.1%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.2%

Return for Risk

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

XDJP.L

XDJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XDJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XDJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 70
XDJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XDJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AASG.L	XDJP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.95	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	2.69	-0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	3.62	-1.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	10.03	-2.42

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the XDJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASG.L and XDJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum XDJP.L drawdown of -99.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASG.L and XDJP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AASG.L	XDJP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-99.99%	+65.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-13.49%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.46%	-18.82%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-20.61%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.12%	-23.69%	-10.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.41%	-99.97%	+85.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-99.40%	+87.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	4.88%	-0.57%

Volatility

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.L) have volatilities of 10.05% and 9.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AASG.L	XDJP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	9.87%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	20.69%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.82%	25.11%	-3.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.93%	18.43%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,144.70%	17.50%	+2,127.20%

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AASG.L vs. XDJP.L - Dividend Comparison

AASG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDJP.L Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D	1.10%	1.33%	1.41%	1.60%	2.47%	1.20%	1.11%	1.13%	1.24%	0.72%	0.83%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AASG.L and XDJP.L in my portfolio?

AASG.L and XDJP.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AASG.L or XDJP.L?

On fees, XDJP.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AASG.L or XDJP.L?

XDJP.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AASG.L.

What is the main difference between AASG.L and XDJP.L?

AASG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XDJP.L is Japan Equities. AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while XDJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AASG.L and 0.09% for XDJP.L.