AASG.L vs. UB20.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) and UB20.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - AASG.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while UB20.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AASG.L returned 68.82%/yr vs 7.24%/yr for UB20.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AASG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for UB20.L.

Performance

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASG.L achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than UB20.L's 10.48% return. Over the past 10 years, AASG.L has outperformed UB20.L with an annualized return of 68.82%, while UB20.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.24% annualized return.

AASG.L

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -11.19%
• 6M: 11.74%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 68.82%

UB20.L

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.07%
• 6M: 7.55%
• YTD: 10.48%
• 1Y: 14.92%
• 3Y*: 11.59%
• 5Y*: 6.44%
• 10Y*: 7.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	18.19%	23.83%	14.04%	0.69%	-11.51%	-4.50%	24.04%	14.10%	6,526.57%	42.10%
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	10.48%	12.00%	6.98%	-0.10%	5.26%	5.29%	3.52%	14.10%	-5.54%	14.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AASG.L and UB20.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2012	0.61

The correlation between AASG.L and UB20.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AASG.L	UB20.L
Technology	52.0%	1.0%
Financial Services	13.1%	45.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	6.3%
Industrials	6.9%	8.5%
Communication Services	6.1%	2.6%
Basic Materials	3.3%	16.3%
Healthcare	2.8%	3.3%
Energy	2.4%	2.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	3.0%
Utilities	1.3%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.7%	7.8%

Return for Risk

AASG.L vs. UB20.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

UB20.L

UB20.L Risk / Return Rank: 49
UB20.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
UB20.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
UB20.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
UB20.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
UB20.L Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AASG.L	UB20.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.32	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	1.98	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.24	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	2.03	+0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	5.61	+1.99

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the UB20.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASG.L and UB20.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than UB20.L's maximum drawdown of -32.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASG.L and UB20.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AASG.L	UB20.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-32.34%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-7.32%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.46%	-17.80%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	-17.80%	-8.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.12%	-32.34%	-1.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.41%	-1.61%	-12.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-6.48%	-4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	2.65%	+1.66%

Volatility

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) at 2.55%. This indicates that AASG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB20.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AASG.L	UB20.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	2.55%	+7.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	8.99%	+10.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.82%	11.29%	+10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.93%	13.99%	+8.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,144.70%	15.73%	+2,128.97%

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UB20.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

AASG.L vs. UB20.L - Dividend Comparison

AASG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.88%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UB20.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	2.88%	3.86%	3.26%	3.96%	3.66%	2.60%	3.05%	4.08%	4.33%	3.43%	4.00%	5.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AASG.L and UB20.L in my portfolio?

AASG.L and UB20.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AASG.L or UB20.L?

On fees, AASG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AASG.L or UB20.L?

AASG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UB20.L.

What is the main difference between AASG.L and UB20.L?

AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while UB20.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AASG.L and 0.30% for UB20.L.