AASG.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - AASG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, AASG.L returned 64.11% vs 30.63% for PACW.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AASG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AASG.L is traded in GBp, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASG.L achieves a 32.89% return, which is significantly higher than PACW.L's 11.96% return.

AASG.L

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: 13.19%
• YTD: 32.89%
• 6M: 35.83%
• 1Y: 64.11%
• 3Y*: 23.54%
• 5Y*: 9.38%
• 10Y*: 12.54%

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 5.84%
• YTD: 11.96%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 30.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	32.89%	18.27%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.96%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AASG.L and PACW.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.67

The correlation between AASG.L and PACW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AASG.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AASG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.50	2.93	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	3.99	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.56	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.56	4.32	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.24	17.62	+1.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.50, which is comparable to the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASG.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AASG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.50	2.93	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	1.24	-0.55

Drawdowns

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, which is greater than PACW.L's maximum drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASG.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AASG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-17.68%	-16.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	-7.06%	-4.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-0.43%	-0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.03%	-3.03%	-8.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	1.73%	+1.59%

Volatility

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) at 2.93%. This indicates that AASG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AASG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	2.93%	+5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.42%	7.75%	+7.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.24%	10.45%	+7.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.68%	13.93%	+3.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.55%	13.93%	+4.62%

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

AASG.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

AASG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PACW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.

Position	TTM
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	0.00%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AASG.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

AASG.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AASG.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AASG.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AASG.L.

What is the main difference between AASG.L and PACW.L?

AASG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PACW.L is Global Equities. AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AASG.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.