AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L
AAPY.L (IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP) and SPYO.L (IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPY.L returned 17.30% vs 10.55% for SPYO.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPYO.L.
Performance
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AAPY.L is traded in USD, while SPYO.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPYO.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPY.L achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly higher than SPYO.L's -3.41% return.
AAPY.L
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 17.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYO.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- -3.41%
- 6M
- -3.01%
- 1Y
- 10.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPY.L IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP | 3.14% | -6.59% | 12.62% |
SPYO.L IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | -3.41% | 16.29% | -7.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPY.L and SPYO.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L — Risk / Return Rank
AAPY.L
SPYO.L
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP (AAPY.L) and IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (SPYO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAPY.L | SPYO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 0.72 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.36 | 2.23 | +0.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAPY.L | SPYO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.88 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.27 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPY.L drawdown since its inception was -30.25%, which is greater than SPYO.L's maximum drawdown of -17.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPY.L and SPYO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPY.L | SPYO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.25% | -17.85% | -12.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.86% | -14.99% | -3.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.43% | -4.48% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -4.80% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.42% | 4.83% | +2.59% |
Volatility
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP (AAPY.L) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (SPYO.L) at 2.30%. This indicates that AAPY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPY.L | SPYO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.30% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 9.05% | +5.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 12.15% | +7.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 14.00% | +10.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 14.00% | +10.34% |
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPY.L vs. SPYO.L - Dividend Comparison
AAPY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, less than SPYO.L's 34.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPY.L IncomeShares Apple (AAPL) Options ETP | 11.15% | 10.77% | 1.08% |
SPYO.L IncomeShares S&P500 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 34.32% | 84.42% | 2.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPY.L and SPYO.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AAPY.L.
Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AAPY.L and 0.45% for SPYO.L.
Find the right allocation for AAPY.L and SPYO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer