PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPX vs. TSMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPX vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPX achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly lower than TSMG's 83.76% return.


AAPX

1D
-0.82%
1M
-11.09%
YTD
7.58%
6M
6.15%
1Y
82.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSMG

1D
1.87%
1M
15.01%
YTD
83.76%
6M
89.30%
1Y
218.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPX vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAPX and TSMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPX vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPX
AAPX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TSMG
TSMG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TSMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
TSMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPX vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAPXTSMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.37

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

6.22

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

19.84

-13.46

AAPX vs. TSMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the TSMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPX and TSMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAPX vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPX drawdown since its inception was -58.55%, smaller than the maximum TSMG drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPX and TSMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPXTSMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.55%

-63.67%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.12%

-35.29%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.39%

-11.88%

-2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-16.63%

-2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.93%

11.05%

+1.88%

Volatility

AAPX vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) is 14.05%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG) has a volatility of 32.95%. This indicates that AAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPXTSMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.05%

32.95%

-18.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.55%

60.72%

-27.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.55%

76.79%

-31.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.44%

83.11%

-28.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.44%

83.11%

-28.67%

AAPX vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPX vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison

AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than TSMG's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPX
T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF
0.62%0.67%21.46%
TSMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF
6.25%11.48%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPX and TSMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSMG has higher volatility (32.95%) compared to AAPX (14.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPX dropped -58.55% vs TSMG's -63.67%.

On 1-year performance, TSMG leads with 218.18% vs 82.26% for AAPX. On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 14.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSMG has performed better with a 218.18% return vs 82.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for AAPX.

TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.25%, compared with 0.62% for AAPX.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for AAPX and 0.75% for TSMG.

TSMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPX and TSMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer