PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPW vs. YSPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPW vs. YSPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPW achieves a 11.28% return, which is significantly higher than YSPY's 3.10% return.


AAPW

1D
-2.57%
1M
3.24%
YTD
11.28%
6M
8.38%
1Y
53.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YSPY

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.42%
YTD
3.10%
6M
4.22%
1Y
23.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPW vs. YSPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAPW
AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF
11.28%11.19%
YSPY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF
3.10%9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPW and YSPY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.49

The correlation between AAPW and YSPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPW vs. YSPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPW
AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

YSPY
YSPY Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
YSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
YSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPW vs. YSPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPWYSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

1.64

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

6.06

+1.71

AAPW vs. YSPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPW Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the YSPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPW and YSPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPWYSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

1.25

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.46

0.00

Drawdowns

AAPW vs. YSPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, which is greater than YSPY's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and YSPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPWYSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.28%

-18.74%

-17.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-14.60%

-2.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.19%

-2.73%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.10%

-4.97%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

3.94%

+2.98%

Volatility

AAPW vs. YSPY - Volatility Comparison

AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY) at 2.68%. This indicates that AAPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YSPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPWYSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

2.68%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

14.35%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.65%

19.24%

+8.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.66%

21.28%

+13.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.66%

21.28%

+13.38%

AAPW vs. YSPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YSPY's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPW vs. YSPY - Dividend Comparison

AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.19%, less than YSPY's 57.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AAPW
AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF
33.19%28.83%
YSPY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF
57.64%45.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPW and YSPY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPW has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to YSPY (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPW dropped -36.28% vs YSPY's -18.74%.

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 53.40% vs 23.83% for YSPY. On fees, AAPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 53.40% return vs 23.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YSPY.

YSPY has the higher dividend yield at 57.64%, compared with 33.19% for AAPW.

AAPW is categorized as Derivative Income, while YSPY is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPW and 1.07% for YSPY.

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPW and YSPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer