PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAPW vs. USOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAPW vs. USOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAPW achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly lower than USOY's 62.18% return.


AAPW

1D
-1.85%
1M
14.30%
YTD
15.21%
6M
9.47%
1Y
59.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USOY

1D
1.45%
1M
-3.43%
YTD
62.18%
6M
59.35%
1Y
57.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAPW vs. USOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AAPW
AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF
15.21%8.56%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
62.18%-11.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AAPW and USOY is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.07

The correlation between AAPW and USOY shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAPW vs. USOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAPW
AAPW Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AAPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPW Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

USOY
USOY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
USOY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
USOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
USOY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAPW vs. USOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAPWUSOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.35

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

4.03

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

7.74

+0.91

AAPW vs. USOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAPW Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the USOY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAPW and USOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAPWUSOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.17

1.89

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.99

-0.44

Drawdowns

AAPW vs. USOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, which is greater than USOY's maximum drawdown of -17.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and USOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAPWUSOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.28%

-17.46%

-18.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.36%

-14.29%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-5.11%

+3.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-6.47%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.91%

7.42%

-0.51%

Volatility

AAPW vs. USOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) is 6.61%, while Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF (USOY) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that AAPW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAPWUSOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.61%

11.62%

-5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.54%

27.18%

-7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.56%

30.44%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.72%

26.13%

+8.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.72%

26.13%

+8.59%

AAPW vs. USOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than USOY's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAPW vs. USOY - Dividend Comparison

AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.37%, less than USOY's 54.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AAPW
AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF
31.37%28.83%0.00%
USOY
Defiance Oil Enhanced Options Income ETF
54.16%104.32%48.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAPW and USOY have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USOY has higher volatility (11.62%) compared to AAPW (6.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPW dropped -36.28% vs USOY's -17.46%.

On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 59.54% vs 57.29% for USOY. On fees, AAPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AAPW has been the lower-risk option at 6.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 59.54% return vs 57.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AAPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.22% for USOY.

USOY has the higher dividend yield at 54.16%, compared with 31.37% for AAPW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPW and 1.22% for USOY.

AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAPW and USOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer