AAPW vs. HYTI
AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AAPW returned 57.24% vs 5.91% for HYTI. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AAPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for HYTI.
Performance
AAPW vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAPW achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly higher than HYTI's 2.14% return.
AAPW
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 57.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTI
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 5.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPW vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 16.63% | 8.71% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 2.14% | 7.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPW and HYTI is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPW vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank
AAPW
HYTI
AAPW vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPW | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.49 | +0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | 10.63 | -2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPW vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and HYTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPW | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.28% | -4.47% | -31.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | -2.38% | -14.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.16% | -0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -0.45% | -10.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.27% | 0.56% | +6.71% |
Volatility
AAPW vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison
AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.07%. This indicates that AAPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPW | HYTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 1.07% | +10.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.49% | 3.21% | +19.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.30% | 3.85% | +25.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.87% | 5.12% | +29.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.87% | 5.12% | +29.75% |
AAPW vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPW vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison
AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.92%, more than HYTI's 10.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 29.92% | 28.83% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.43% | 8.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPW and HYTI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPW has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to HYTI (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAPW dropped -36.28% vs HYTI's -4.47%.
On 1-year performance, AAPW leads with 57.24% vs 5.91% for HYTI. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPW has performed better with a 57.24% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AAPW.
AAPW has the higher dividend yield at 29.92%, compared with 10.43% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPW and 0.65% for HYTI.
AAPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAPW and HYTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer