AAPW vs. FIYY
AAPW (AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF) and FIYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AAPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for FIYY.
Performance
AAPW vs. FIYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AAPW
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 22.31%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 57.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIYY
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPW vs. FIYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 15.71% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAPW and FIYY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAPW vs. FIYY — Risk / Return Rank
AAPW
FIYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AAPW vs. FIYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF (AAPW) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF (FIYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAPW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.90 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAPW vs. FIYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAPW drawdown since its inception was -36.28%, which is greater than FIYY's maximum drawdown of -2.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAPW and FIYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAPW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.28% | -2.51% | -33.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -1.97% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -1.48% | -9.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.27% | — | — |
Volatility
AAPW vs. FIYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAPW | FIYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.30% | 5.05% | +24.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.87% | 5.05% | +29.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.87% | 5.05% | +29.82% |
AAPW vs. FIYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FIYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAPW vs. FIYY - Dividend Comparison
AAPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.92%, more than FIYY's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAPW AAPL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 29.92% | 28.83% |
FIYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST 20Y+ Treasuries ETF | 1.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAPW and FIYY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAPW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAPW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for FIYY.
AAPW has the higher dividend yield at 29.92%, compared with 1.13% for FIYY.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AAPW and 1.07% for FIYY.
Find the right allocation for AAPW and FIYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer