PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAOTX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAOTX achieves a 8.28% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 12.26% return.


AAOTX

1D
1.83%
1M
-1.77%
6M
5.39%
YTD
8.28%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
16.20%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.52%

FQLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.35%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AAOTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A
8.28%20.36%15.20%21.16%-19.94%16.85%46.68%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
12.26%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%46.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AAOTX and FQLSX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.97

The correlation between AAOTX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAOTX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AAOTX
AAOTX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AAOTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAOTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAOTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AAOTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAOTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAOTXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

2.42

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.27

10.10

-2.84

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAOTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAOTX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAOTX drawdown since its inception was -27.57%, smaller than the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAOTX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAOTXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.57%

-31.26%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-9.48%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-15.37%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-27.41%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-2.17%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-5.36%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.27%

+0.02%

Volatility

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A (AAOTX) is 3.86%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that AAOTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAOTXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

4.40%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

12.17%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

14.19%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

15.36%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.10%

16.12%

-1.02%

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAOTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAOTX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

AAOTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, less than FQLSX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAOTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund Class A
4.07%4.41%2.52%1.71%3.67%1.34%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.66%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, AAOTX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to AAOTX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAOTX dropped -27.57% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAOTX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer