AAMCX vs. RQEIX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

AAMCX (Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund) and RQEIX (RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, AAMCX returned 5.67%/yr vs 6.22%/yr for RQEIX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAMCX charges 2.70%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for RQEIX.

Performance

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAMCX achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than RQEIX's 8.49% return. Over the past 10 years, AAMCX has underperformed RQEIX with an annualized return of 5.67%, while RQEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.22% annualized return.

AAMCX

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: 2.21%
• YTD: 8.97%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 18.39%
• 3Y*: 12.37%
• 5Y*: 4.87%
• 10Y*: 5.67%

RQEIX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 25.39%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 4.58%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	8.97%	9.86%	10.16%	12.53%	-19.02%	14.36%	4.78%	9.61%	-6.22%	10.64%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	8.49%	14.97%	15.35%	20.27%	-17.06%	-8.45%	14.11%	7.53%	-6.02%	11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AAMCX and RQEIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.62

The correlation between AAMCX and RQEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAMCX vs. RQEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAMCX

AAMCX Risk / Return Rank: 52
AAMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
AAMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
AAMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
AAMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
AAMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

RQEIX

RQEIX Risk / Return Rank: 93
RQEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RQEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RQEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RQEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RQEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) and RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAMCX	RQEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	3.15	-1.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	4.68	-1.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.63	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.88	7.53	-4.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.60	18.94	-6.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAMCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the RQEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAMCX and RQEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAMCX	RQEIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	3.15	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.27	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.39	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.23	+0.25

Drawdowns

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAMCX drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum RQEIX drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAMCX and RQEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAMCX	RQEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.73%	-33.25%	+10.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-3.36%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.42%	-17.96%	+2.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.73%	-32.96%	+10.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.73%	-33.25%	+10.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	-0.64%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.56%	-11.26%	+5.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	1.33%	+0.11%

Volatility

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund (AAMCX) is 2.39%, while RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund (RQEIX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that AAMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAMCX	RQEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.39%	3.39%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.15%	5.36%	+1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.57%	8.03%	+1.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.83%	16.72%	-4.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.27%	16.02%	-4.75%

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAMCX has a 2.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RQEIX's 1.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAMCX vs. RQEIX - Dividend Comparison

AAMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than RQEIX's 13.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AAMCX Absolute Capital Asset Allocator Fund	2.20%	2.40%	3.64%	0.00%	0.00%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	11.86%	3.78%	1.20%
RQEIX RESQ Dynamic Allocation Fund	13.65%	14.53%	0.38%	0.00%	0.38%	0.00%	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAMCX and RQEIX in my portfolio?

AAMCX and RQEIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAMCX or RQEIX?

RQEIX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to AAMCX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAMCX dropped -22.73% vs RQEIX's -33.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RQEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.