PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AALG vs. CMGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AALG vs. CMGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AALG achieves a -6.66% return, which is significantly higher than CMGG's -37.52% return.


AALG

1D
1.05%
1M
32.00%
YTD
-6.66%
6M
-10.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMGG

1D
2.82%
1M
-12.95%
YTD
-37.52%
6M
-40.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AALG vs. CMGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AALG and CMGG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AALG vs. CMGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AAL Daily ETF (AALG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AALG vs. CMGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AALG vs. CMGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AALG drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, which is greater than CMGG's maximum drawdown of -56.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALG and CMGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AALGCMGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.19%

-56.75%

-7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.45%

-48.19%

+30.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.56%

-23.37%

-2.19%

Volatility

AALG vs. CMGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AALGCMGGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.80%

68.93%

+26.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.80%

68.93%

+26.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

95.80%

68.93%

+26.87%

AALG vs. CMGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AALG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than CMGG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AALG vs. CMGG - Dividend Comparison

AALG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


AALG and CMGG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for AALG.

AALG has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.00% for CMGG.

Their fees differ too: 0.78% for AALG and 0.75% for CMGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AALG and CMGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer