PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAGOX vs. IETC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAGOX vs. IETC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AAGOX) and iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAGOX achieves a 26.23% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's 6.94% return.


AAGOX

1D
2.26%
1M
8.36%
YTD
26.23%
6M
24.06%
1Y
54.30%
3Y*
35.59%
5Y*
14.62%
10Y*
20.17%

IETC

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.10%
YTD
6.94%
6M
5.46%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
27.11%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAGOX vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AAGOX
Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund
26.23%29.82%42.89%32.67%-38.76%12.63%67.21%27.43%-3.38%
IETC
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF
6.94%19.56%37.57%54.35%-32.78%29.73%46.59%43.09%-3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between AAGOX and IETC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018

0.92

The correlation between AAGOX and IETC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAGOX vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAGOX
AAGOX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AAGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AAGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IETC
IETC Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAGOX vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AAGOX) and iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAGOXIETCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.18

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.05

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

2.87

+6.24

AAGOX vs. IETC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAGOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the IETC Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAGOX and IETC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAGOX vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAGOX drawdown since its inception was -60.22%, which is greater than IETC's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAGOX and IETC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAGOXIETCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.22%

-38.48%

-21.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.11%

-21.19%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-25.17%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.07%

-38.48%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.21%

+8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.69%

-8.14%

-7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.84%

7.76%

-1.92%

Volatility

AAGOX vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison

Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AAGOX) and iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) have volatilities of 10.50% and 10.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAGOXIETCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.50%

10.48%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.05%

18.02%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.35%

22.63%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.41%

24.81%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.87%

25.47%

-0.60%

AAGOX vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAGOX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAGOX vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison

AAGOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than IETC's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAGOX
Alger Large Cap Growth Portfolio Fund
9.60%12.11%0.00%0.00%5.91%28.74%14.75%1.88%22.68%9.81%0.00%12.42%
IETC
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF
0.39%0.38%0.52%0.79%0.92%0.73%0.48%0.95%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAGOX and IETC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAGOX has higher volatility (10.50%) compared to IETC (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAGOX dropped -60.22% vs IETC's -38.48%.

AAGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAGOX and IETC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer