AACSX vs. FFGZX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AACSX (American Century One Choice Blend+ 2040 Portfolio) and FFGZX (Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, AACSX returned 6.80%/yr vs 3.08%/yr for FFGZX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AACSX charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FFGZX.

Performance

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century One Choice Blend+ 2040 Portfolio (AACSX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AACSX achieves a 7.92% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 3.81% return.

AACSX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 19.70%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: —

FFGZX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 3.81%
• 6M: 3.79%
• 1Y: 9.19%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: 3.08%
• 10Y*: 4.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AACSX American Century One Choice Blend+ 2040 Portfolio	7.92%	16.83%	11.52%	14.77%	-16.20%	8.09%
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class	3.81%	9.13%	5.02%	8.32%	-11.07%	3.91%

Correlation

The correlation between AACSX and FFGZX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021	0.74

The correlation between AACSX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (5 years) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AACSX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AACSX

AACSX Risk / Return Rank: 62
AACSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AACSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
AACSX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
AACSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AACSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FFGZX

FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2040 Portfolio (AACSX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AACSX	FFGZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	2.20	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	3.23	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.44	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	2.86	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.06	12.41	-0.36

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AACSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AACSX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AACSX drawdown since its inception was -24.20%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AACSX and FFGZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AACSX	FFGZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.20%	-14.94%	-9.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.38%	-3.33%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-4.76%	-7.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.20%	-14.94%	-9.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-14.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.45%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.11%	-2.26%	-3.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	0.76%	+0.94%

Volatility

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

American Century One Choice Blend+ 2040 Portfolio (AACSX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.86%. This indicates that AACSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AACSX	FFGZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.56%	1.86%	+1.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.82%	3.68%	+4.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.58%	4.32%	+5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.03%	5.14%	+6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.88%	4.46%	+7.42%

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AACSX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

AACSX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

AACSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than FFGZX's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AACSX American Century One Choice Blend+ 2040 Portfolio	3.46%	3.73%	3.84%	1.96%	3.12%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FFGZX Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class	3.22%	3.30%	3.18%	2.88%	3.11%	2.10%	2.22%	7.35%	3.00%	1.95%	1.56%	1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AACSX and FFGZX in my portfolio?

AACSX and FFGZX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AACSX or FFGZX?

AACSX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to FFGZX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AACSX dropped -24.20% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.