AAAZX vs. WARAX
AAAZX (DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund) and WARAX (Allspring Absolute Return Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, AAAZX returned 6.84%/yr vs 5.55%/yr for WARAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAAZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for WARAX.
Performance
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAAZX achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than WARAX's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAZX has outperformed WARAX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while WARAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.55% annualized return.
AAAZX
- 1D
- -4.77%
- 1M
- -7.95%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.10%
- 1Y
- 8.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
WARAX
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- 13.16%
- 6M
- 13.05%
- 1Y
- 22.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 5.55%
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund | 3.51% | 13.14% | 5.49% | 2.64% | -9.57% | 23.83% | 3.91% | 21.79% | -5.05% | 14.97% |
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 13.16% | 8.07% | 5.93% | 12.53% | -2.75% | 2.25% | -3.25% | 11.65% | -5.78% | 12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAAZX and WARAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012 | 0.66 |
The correlation between AAAZX and WARAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAAZX vs. WARAX — Risk / Return Rank
AAAZX
WARAX
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAAZX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 4.62 | -3.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 17.65 | -13.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAAZX drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, which is greater than WARAX's maximum drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAZX and WARAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAAZX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.45% | -23.16% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -5.03% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.15% | -5.67% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -13.05% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.44% | -23.16% | -6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.11% | -5.03% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -3.83% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 1.31% | +0.54% |
Volatility
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Volatility Comparison
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) at 3.66%. This indicates that AAAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAAZX | WARAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.36% | 3.66% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.97% | 7.61% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 9.04% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 7.80% | +4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.79% | 7.95% | +4.84% |
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAAZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than WARAX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAAZX vs. WARAX - Dividend Comparison
AAAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than WARAX's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAZX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund | 1.88% | 4.15% | 2.85% | 2.40% | 4.50% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 2.07% | 1.89% | 1.79% | 1.82% | 2.53% |
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund | 1.77% | 2.00% | 10.90% | 2.80% | 2.34% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.38% | 2.66% | 1.77% | 0.76% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAAZX and WARAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAAZX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to WARAX (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAZX dropped -40.45% vs WARAX's -23.16%.
WARAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAAZX and WARAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer