PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAZX vs. MSTGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) and Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAZX achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than MSTGX's 5.85% return.


AAAZX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-8.37%
YTD
3.03%
6M
2.62%
1Y
8.98%
3Y*
9.35%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
6.79%

MSTGX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
5.85%
6M
5.66%
1Y
10.59%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
4.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
3.03%13.14%5.49%2.64%-9.57%23.83%3.91%21.79%-3.21%
MSTGX
Morningstar Global Income Fund
5.85%12.04%5.36%11.91%-11.18%8.46%3.92%19.97%-3.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAZX and MSTGX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2018

0.80

The correlation between AAAZX and MSTGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAZX vs. MSTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAZX
AAAZX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AAAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTGX
MSTGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MSTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) and Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAAZXMSTGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.37

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

2.96

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

9.37

-5.23

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the MSTGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAZX and MSTGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAZX drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, which is greater than MSTGX's maximum drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAZX and MSTGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAZXMSTGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.45%

-27.52%

-12.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-4.38%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.15%

-6.56%

-3.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-19.64%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.53%

-1.35%

-8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-4.30%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.26%

+0.68%

Volatility

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Volatility Comparison

DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund (AAAZX) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to Morningstar Global Income Fund (MSTGX) at 1.87%. This indicates that AAAZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAZXMSTGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

1.87%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

4.96%

+4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.46%

6.50%

+3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

8.13%

+4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.79%

10.81%

+1.98%

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAZX vs. MSTGX - Dividend Comparison

AAAZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than MSTGX's 2.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAZX
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund
1.88%4.15%2.85%2.40%4.50%2.62%1.60%2.07%1.89%1.79%1.82%2.53%
MSTGX
Morningstar Global Income Fund
2.93%2.97%6.64%6.32%8.79%10.48%2.96%4.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAZX and MSTGX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAAZX has higher volatility (5.34%) compared to MSTGX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAZX dropped -40.45% vs MSTGX's -27.52%.

MSTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAZX and MSTGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer