AAAPX vs. WARAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAAPX (DWS RREEF Real Assets C) and WARAX (Allspring Absolute Return Fund) are both Global Allocation funds. Over the past 10 years, AAAPX returned 6.25%/yr vs 5.74%/yr for WARAX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAAPX charges 1.97%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for WARAX.

Performance

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAPX achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly lower than WARAX's 15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, AAAPX has outperformed WARAX with an annualized return of 6.25%, while WARAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.74% annualized return.

AAAPX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -3.41%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.84%
• 1Y: 12.77%
• 3Y*: 10.18%
• 5Y*: 4.10%
• 10Y*: 6.25%

WARAX

• 1D: 0.24%
• 1M: -2.16%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 25.29%
• 3Y*: 12.78%
• 5Y*: 6.99%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAAPX DWS RREEF Real Assets C	8.18%	11.95%	4.44%	1.53%	-10.52%	22.45%	2.94%	20.53%	-6.01%	13.69%
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	15.15%	8.07%	5.93%	12.53%	-2.75%	2.25%	-3.25%	11.65%	-5.78%	12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAPX and WARAX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012	0.66

The correlation between AAAPX and WARAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AAAPX vs. WARAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAPX

AAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 32
AAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
AAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
AAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
AAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
AAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

WARAX

WARAX Risk / Return Rank: 92
WARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
WARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
WARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
WARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) and Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAPX	WARAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	2.91	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	3.90	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.56	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	6.77	-4.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.32	20.18	-12.86

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the WARAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAPX and WARAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.74%, which is greater than WARAX's maximum drawdown of -23.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAPX and WARAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAPX	WARAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.74%	-23.16%	-17.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.69%	-3.81%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.49%	-5.67%	-4.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.42%	-13.05%	-10.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.51%	-23.16%	-6.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	-3.35%	-1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-3.83%	-3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.27%	+0.53%

Volatility

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) is 2.54%, while Allspring Absolute Return Fund (WARAX) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that AAAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAAPX	WARAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	3.27%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.39%	7.38%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.24%	8.87%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.07%	7.76%	+4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.72%	7.97%	+4.75%

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAPX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than WARAX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAPX vs. WARAX - Dividend Comparison

AAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than WARAX's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAAPX DWS RREEF Real Assets C	0.32%	1.27%	1.48%	1.33%	3.38%	1.57%	0.60%	1.09%	0.83%	0.84%	1.07%	1.36%
WARAX Allspring Absolute Return Fund	1.74%	2.00%	10.90%	2.80%	2.34%	3.23%	3.34%	3.38%	2.66%	1.77%	0.76%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAPX and WARAX in my portfolio?

AAAPX and WARAX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAAPX or WARAX?

WARAX has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to AAAPX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAPX dropped -40.74% vs WARAX's -23.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WARAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.