PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAPX vs. RALIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) and Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAPX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly lower than RALIX's 12.25% return.


AAAPX

1D
0.64%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
10.36%
6M
10.74%
1Y
16.06%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
4.27%
10Y*
6.39%

RALIX

1D
0.68%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
12.25%
6M
13.20%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAAPX
DWS RREEF Real Assets C
10.36%11.95%4.44%1.53%-10.52%22.45%2.94%20.53%-6.01%13.56%
RALIX
Lazard Real Assets Portfolio
12.25%15.60%5.91%4.43%-8.99%22.32%0.61%16.07%-7.59%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAPX and RALIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.91

The correlation between AAAPX and RALIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAPX vs. RALIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAPX
AAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
AAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

RALIX
RALIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RALIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RALIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RALIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RALIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RALIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) and Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAAPXRALIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.99

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.05

15.71

-5.66

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the RALIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAPX and RALIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAAPXRALIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.54

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.60

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.62

-0.30

Drawdowns

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAPX drawdown since its inception was -40.74%, which is greater than RALIX's maximum drawdown of -24.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAPX and RALIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAPXRALIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.74%

-24.00%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.69%

-5.46%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-9.72%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.42%

-22.03%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-2.63%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-5.75%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.38%

+0.19%

Volatility

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DWS RREEF Real Assets C (AAAPX) is 2.54%, while Lazard Real Assets Portfolio (RALIX) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that AAAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RALIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAPXRALIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

2.92%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.24%

6.76%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.99%

8.61%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.10%

11.81%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.71%

11.17%

+1.54%

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAPX has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RALIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAPX vs. RALIX - Dividend Comparison

AAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than RALIX's 7.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAPX
DWS RREEF Real Assets C
1.15%1.27%1.48%1.33%3.38%1.57%0.60%1.09%0.83%0.84%1.07%1.36%
RALIX
Lazard Real Assets Portfolio
7.86%7.04%3.07%2.93%7.65%11.84%3.93%2.24%5.27%1.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAAPX and RALIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RALIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to AAAPX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAPX dropped -40.74% vs RALIX's -24.00%.

RALIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAPX and RALIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer