PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAANX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAANX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Active Asset Allocation Fund (AAANX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAANX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 9.63% return.


AAANX

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.41%
YTD
11.70%
6M
10.87%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
11.01%

FNILX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.34%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.65%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
21.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAANX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AAANX
Horizon Active Asset Allocation Fund
11.70%16.58%12.43%17.25%-16.99%21.42%14.69%20.60%-15.67%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
9.63%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AAANX and FNILX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2018

0.96

The correlation between AAANX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAANX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAANX
AAANX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AAANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAANX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
AAANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAANX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAANX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Active Asset Allocation Fund (AAANX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAANXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.94

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

12.99

-1.77

AAANX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAANX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAANX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAANX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAANX drawdown since its inception was -34.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAANX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAANXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.18%

-33.76%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-9.01%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-19.08%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

-25.40%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

-1.73%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-5.35%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.03%

+0.45%

Volatility

AAANX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Active Asset Allocation Fund (AAANX) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 4.82%. This indicates that AAANX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAANXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

4.82%

+1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.18%

9.90%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

12.61%

+1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

17.34%

-1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.66%

20.04%

-2.38%

AAANX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAANX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAANX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

AAANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than FNILX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAANX
Horizon Active Asset Allocation Fund
3.98%4.45%18.43%0.78%1.08%15.02%6.59%0.67%7.46%12.35%0.89%1.36%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AAANX and FNILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAANX has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to FNILX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAANX dropped -34.18% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAANX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer