PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAMX vs. LTFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAAMX achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly lower than LTFIX's 6.75% return.


AAAMX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
3.62%
6M
3.23%
1Y
10.38%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
4.11%
10Y*

LTFIX

1D
-1.74%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
6.75%
6M
5.96%
1Y
17.19%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
11.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AAAMX
American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio
3.62%11.63%6.87%10.81%-13.19%6.88%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
6.75%17.80%17.28%20.33%-18.84%13.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAMX and LTFIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2021

0.90

The correlation between AAAMX and LTFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAMX vs. LTFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAMX
AAAMX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AAAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LTFIX
LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) and Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAAMXLTFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.17

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.30

9.48

+0.82

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the LTFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAMX and LTFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAMX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, smaller than the maximum LTFIX drawdown of -52.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAMX and LTFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAMXLTFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-52.73%

+33.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.72%

-8.71%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-15.70%

+9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.03%

-26.80%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-2.66%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-7.62%

+2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

1.98%

-0.91%

Volatility

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) is 2.17%, while Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that AAAMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAMXLTFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

5.17%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.74%

10.48%

-5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

12.66%

-6.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.71%

15.59%

-7.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.60%

15.82%

-8.22%

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAMX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than LTFIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAMX vs. LTFIX - Dividend Comparison

AAAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than LTFIX's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAMX
American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio
2.95%5.13%3.20%2.10%2.85%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LTFIX
Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund
8.18%8.73%8.47%4.17%8.60%5.83%3.91%6.03%6.60%3.51%3.99%4.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AAAMX and LTFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTFIX has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to AAAMX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAMX dropped -19.03% vs LTFIX's -52.73%.

AAAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAMX and LTFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer