PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAAMX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AAAMX having a 4.48% return and FFGZX slightly lower at 4.28%.


AAAMX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.86%
YTD
4.48%
6M
4.79%
1Y
12.74%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*

FFGZX

1D
0.16%
1M
1.75%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.42%
1Y
10.55%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AAAMX
American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio
4.48%11.63%6.87%10.81%-13.19%6.88%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
4.28%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAMX and FFGZX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2021

0.86

The correlation between AAAMX and FFGZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAAMX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAMX
AAAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
AAAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
AAAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AAAMXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.36

2.64

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

3.97

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.54

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.18

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.13

14.23

-2.09

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAAMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAAMX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAAMXFFGZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.64

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.65

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.93

-0.29

Drawdowns

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAMX drawdown since its inception was -19.03%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAMX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAAMXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.03%

-14.94%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.72%

-3.33%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-4.76%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.03%

-14.94%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-2.26%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

0.74%

+0.32%

Volatility

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio (AAAMX) has a higher volatility of 1.71% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.49%. This indicates that AAAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAAMXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

1.49%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

3.34%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.46%

4.01%

+1.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.67%

5.08%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.59%

4.43%

+3.16%

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAMX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAAMX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

AAAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than FFGZX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAAMX
American Century One Choice Blend+ 2020 Portfolio
2.92%5.13%3.20%2.10%2.85%2.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.21%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, AAAMX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AAAMX has higher volatility (1.71%) compared to FFGZX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAAMX dropped -19.03% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAAMX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer