AAAD vs. BUFP

Last updated Jul 28, 2026

AAAD (PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAAD is a CLO fund actively managed by PGIM, while BUFP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. AAAD is actively managed, while BUFP is passively managed. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AAAD charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUFP.

Performance

AAAD vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF (AAAD) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AAAD

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

BUFP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 5.46%
• YTD: 6.43%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF	$4.58K	$8.25K	$10.10K
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	$1.57M	$1.32M	$1.52M

AAAD vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF	-0.04%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	-0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AAAD and BUFP is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026	0.20

Return for Risk

AAAD vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAAD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 85
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAAD vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF (AAAD) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAAD	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.94	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.11	—

Drawdowns

AAAD vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAAD drawdown since its inception was -1.37%, smaller than the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAAD and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAAD	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.37%	-11.98%	+10.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-0.77%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-0.97%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAAD	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.56%	6.40%	-2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.56%	9.31%	-5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.56%	9.31%	-5.75%

AAAD vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAAD has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAAD vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

AAAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AAAD PGIM AAA CLO Aggregate Duration ETF	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAAD and BUFP in my portfolio?

AAAD and BUFP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAAD or BUFP?

On fees, AAAD is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAAD or BUFP?

AAAD is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUFP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAAD or BUFP?

AAAD has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.01% for BUFP.

What is the main difference between AAAD and BUFP?

AAAD is categorized as CLO, while BUFP is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for AAAD and 0.50% for BUFP.