AAACX vs. QSPIX

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

AAACX (Alpha Alternative Assets Fund) and QSPIX (AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, AAACX returned -1.24%/yr vs 20.11%/yr for QSPIX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Alternative Assets Fund (AAACX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I (QSPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAACX achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than QSPIX's 15.84% return.

AAACX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 4.20%
• YTD: 4.68%
• 1Y: 7.11%
• 3Y*: 6.26%
• 5Y*: -1.24%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -0.13%

QSPIX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 3.41%
• 6M: 17.47%
• YTD: 15.84%
• 1Y: 23.57%
• 3Y*: 19.42%
• 5Y*: 20.11%
• 10Y*: 7.70%
• ALL TIME*: 7.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AAACX Alpha Alternative Assets Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QSPIX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AAACX Alpha Alternative Assets Fund	4.68%	6.27%	5.85%	3.75%	-20.30%	-6.20%	4.86%	3.51%
QSPIX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I	15.84%	14.82%	21.48%	12.46%	30.76%	24.93%	-21.96%	-3.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AAACX and QSPIX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019	-0.05

Return for Risk

AAACX vs. QSPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAACX

AAACX Risk / Return Rank: 48
AAACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
AAACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
AAACX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
AAACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
AAACX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

QSPIX

QSPIX Risk / Return Rank: 91
QSPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QSPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
QSPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QSPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
QSPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Alternative Assets Fund (AAACX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I (QSPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAACX	QSPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	2.51	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	3.72	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.12	1.44	+0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	4.77	-3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.00	13.02	-9.03

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the QSPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAACX and QSPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAACX drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum QSPIX drawdown of -41.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAACX and QSPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAACX	QSPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-41.37%	+12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.44%	-5.09%	+0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.44%	-9.31%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.67%	-17.13%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.70%	0.00%	-12.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.36%	-9.33%	-7.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.86%	-0.04%

Volatility

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Alternative Assets Fund (AAACX) is 0.25%, while AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I (QSPIX) has a volatility of 2.03%. This indicates that AAACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAACX	QSPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.25%	2.03%	-1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.10%	7.09%	-5.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	9.69%	-3.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.99%	15.84%	-8.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.37%	12.84%	-4.47%

Dividends

AAACX vs. QSPIX - Dividend Comparison

AAACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than QSPIX's 2.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAACX Alpha Alternative Assets Fund	5.56%	5.15%	3.11%	7.84%	4.68%	12.02%	5.87%	1.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QSPIX AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund - Class I	2.22%	2.57%	6.95%	23.77%	22.68%	12.78%	0.00%	1.62%	0.96%	7.08%	1.74%	5.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAACX and QSPIX in my portfolio?

AAACX and QSPIX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAACX or QSPIX?

QSPIX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to AAACX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAACX dropped -28.76% vs QSPIX's -41.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QSPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.