PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

AAA.AX (BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF) and UMAX.AX (Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAA.AX is a Money Market fund actively managed by BetaShares, while UMAX.AX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by BetaShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, AAA.AX returned 2.13%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for UMAX.AX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF (AAA.AX) and Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAA.AX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than UMAX.AX's -0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, AAA.AX has underperformed UMAX.AX with an annualized return of 2.13%, while UMAX.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.

AAA.AX

1D
0.02%
1M
0.39%
6M
1.45%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
3.07%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
2.13%

UMAX.AX

1D
-1.20%
1M
0.97%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
6.66%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAA.AX
BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF		1.62%3.76%3.87%3.75%1.38%0.35%0.74%1.69%1.87%1.39%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		-0.54%4.00%31.81%15.37%-9.29%29.75%-6.67%22.95%2.49%5.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AAA.AX and UMAX.AX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2014

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF

Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF

Often compared with AAA.AX:
AAA.AX vs. ARMR.AXAAA.AX vs. A200.AXAAA.AX vs. DHHF.AXAAA.AX vs. EX20.AXAAA.AX vs. FOOD.AXAAA.AX vs. GEAR.AXAAA.AX vs. GGUS.AX
Often compared with UMAX.AX:
UMAX.AX vs. CORE.AXUMAX.AX vs. F100.AXUMAX.AX vs. FOOD.AXUMAX.AX vs. GEAR.AXUMAX.AX vs. IHOO.AXUMAX.AX vs. SEMI.AXUMAX.AX vs. VDCO.AX

Return for Risk

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
AAA.AX
AAA.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AAA.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAA.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAA.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
AAA.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAA.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX
UMAX.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMAX.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF (AAA.AX) and Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

AAA.AXUMAX.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.08
0.65

+3.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.34
0.94

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.81

1.12

+1.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.37

0.58

+8.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.00

1.35

+28.65

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAA.AX Sharpe Ratio is 4.08, which is higher than the UMAX.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAA.AX and UMAX.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAA.AX drawdown since its inception was -0.36%, smaller than the maximum UMAX.AX drawdown of -24.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAA.AX and UMAX.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

AAA.AXUMAX.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-24.10%

+23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.32%

-11.14%

+10.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.32%

-15.42%

+15.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.32%

-17.14%

+16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.32%

-24.10%

+23.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.61%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-5.15%

+5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

4.86%

-4.76%

Volatility

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF (AAA.AX) is 0.09%, while Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF (UMAX.AX) has a volatility of 3.05%. This indicates that AAA.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMAX.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

AAA.AXUMAX.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.09%

3.05%

-2.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.65%

7.92%

-7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

9.94%

-9.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.50%

12.93%

-12.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.48%

13.42%

-12.94%

Dividends

AAA.AX vs. UMAX.AX - Dividend Comparison

AAA.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than UMAX.AX's 3.16% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAA.AX
BetaShares Australian High Interest Cash ETF		3.06%3.77%3.73%3.56%1.13%0.35%0.82%1.74%1.87%1.36%1.68%1.54%
UMAX.AX
Betashares S&P 500 Yield Maximiser Complex ETF		3.16%5.33%2.19%4.02%5.79%5.05%7.02%5.43%4.06%3.16%4.12%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

AAA.AX and UMAX.AX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAA.AX is categorized as Money Market, while UMAX.AX is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAA.AX and UMAX.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer