A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

A4H8.DE (Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - A4H8.DE is a European Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate ESG Sustainability SRI, while LYMS.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, A4H8.DE returned 4.47%/yr vs 24.71%/yr for LYMS.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. A4H8.DE charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.

Performance

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (A4H8.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, A4H8.DE achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return.

A4H8.DE

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 2.16%
• 3Y*: 4.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LYMS.DE

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 7.96%
• YTD: 20.63%
• 6M: 18.72%
• 1Y: 37.20%
• 3Y*: 24.71%
• 5Y*: 18.88%
• 10Y*: 21.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
A4H8.DE Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.54%	2.94%	4.18%	7.09%	-8.39%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	20.63%	7.15%	33.72%	51.52%	-23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between A4H8.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022	0.22

Return for Risk

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

A4H8.DE

A4H8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
A4H8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
A4H8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
A4H8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 19
A4H8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
A4H8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

LYMS.DE

LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 71
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (A4H8.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	A4H8.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	2.40	-1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	3.19	-2.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.42	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.73	3.77	-3.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	11.23	-8.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current A4H8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of A4H8.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	A4H8.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	2.40	-1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.77	-0.50

Drawdowns

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum A4H8.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.35%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for A4H8.DE and LYMS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	A4H8.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.35%	-50.00%	+38.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.52%	-10.02%	+7.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.52%	-26.74%	+24.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.86%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	-8.78%	+5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	3.37%	-2.61%

Volatility

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (A4H8.DE) is 1.11%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that A4H8.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	A4H8.DE	LYMS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.11%	4.37%	-3.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.59%	10.99%	-8.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.97%	15.73%	-12.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.91%	19.91%	-15.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.91%	19.68%	-14.77%

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

A4H8.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

A4H8.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither A4H8.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
A4H8.DE Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.65%	0.69%	0.76%	1.09%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both A4H8.DE and LYMS.DE in my portfolio?

A4H8.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, A4H8.DE or LYMS.DE?

On fees, A4H8.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, A4H8.DE or LYMS.DE?

A4H8.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

What is the main difference between A4H8.DE and LYMS.DE?

A4H8.DE is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. A4H8.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate ESG Sustainability SRI, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for A4H8.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.