8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE
8PSB.DE (Invesco Physical Silver ETC) and FWIA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - 8PSB.DE is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while FWIA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 8PSB.DE returned 110.49% vs 26.57% for FWIA.DE. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 8PSB.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWIA.DE.
Performance
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 8PSB.DE achieves a -2.37% return, which is significantly lower than FWIA.DE's 12.60% return.
8PSB.DE
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 29.53%
- 1Y
- 110.49%
- 3Y*
- 42.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWIA.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 26.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
8PSB.DE Invesco Physical Silver ETC | -2.37% | 130.25% | 30.85% | 3.36% |
FWIA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | 12.60% | 9.02% | 24.70% | 7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between 8PSB.DE and FWIA.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
8PSB.DE
FWIA.DE
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 8PSB.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 4.08 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.09 | 16.52 | -10.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 8PSB.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.89 | 2.36 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.40 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 8PSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than FWIA.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSB.DE and FWIA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 8PSB.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.62% | -20.96% | -17.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.62% | -6.49% | -32.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.51% | -0.62% | -32.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.18% | -2.44% | -8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.07% | 1.60% | +16.47% |
Volatility
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) has a higher volatility of 16.36% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) at 2.96%. This indicates that 8PSB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWIA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 8PSB.DE | FWIA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.36% | 2.96% | +13.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.95% | 8.09% | +43.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.17% | 11.22% | +46.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 13.18% | +21.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 13.18% | +21.45% |
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
8PSB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FWIA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
8PSB.DE vs. FWIA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 8PSB.DE nor FWIA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
8PSB.DE and FWIA.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWIA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWIA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for 8PSB.DE.
8PSB.DE is categorized as Silver, while FWIA.DE is Global Equities. 8PSB.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while FWIA.DE tracks FTSE All-World. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for 8PSB.DE and 0.15% for FWIA.DE.
Find the right allocation for 8PSB.DE and FWIA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer