PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
8PSB.DE vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

8PSB.DE is traded in EUR, while EMXC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMXC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 8PSB.DE achieves a -20.12% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 45.33% return.


8PSB.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-20.61%
YTD
-20.12%
6M
-12.91%
1Y
67.59%
3Y*
31.35%
5Y*
14.52%
10Y*
11.06%

EMXC

1D
1.60%
1M
4.59%
YTD
45.33%
6M
47.20%
1Y
71.00%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
8PSB.DE
Invesco Physical Silver ETC
-20.12%130.25%18.21%-0.84%4.98%-13.65%47.00%16.08%-9.66%3.23%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
45.33%19.10%9.46%15.39%-14.58%16.65%3.46%18.41%-8.87%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between 8PSB.DE and EMXC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2017

0.15

The correlation between 8PSB.DE and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

8PSB.DE
8PSB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
8PSB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


8PSB.DEEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.56

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

6.04

-4.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

21.87

-18.57

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 8PSB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 8PSB.DE and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 8PSB.DE drawdown since its inception was -76.19%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -37.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 8PSB.DE and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


8PSB.DEEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.19%

-37.86%

-38.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.60%

-11.81%

-33.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.60%

-18.28%

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.60%

-18.28%

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.60%

-4.09%

-41.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.66%

-6.58%

-47.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.48%

3.26%

+17.22%

Volatility

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Physical Silver ETC (8PSB.DE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) have volatilities of 14.13% and 13.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


8PSB.DEEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.13%

13.47%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.99%

21.69%

+31.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.75%

23.67%

+36.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.94%

16.79%

+19.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.10%

19.42%

+12.68%

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

8PSB.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

8PSB.DE vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

8PSB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
8PSB.DE
Invesco Physical Silver ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
1.89%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


8PSB.DE and EMXC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 8PSB.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

8PSB.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

8PSB.DE is categorized as Silver, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. 8PSB.DE tracks LBMA Silver Price, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for 8PSB.DE and 0.49% for EMXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 8PSB.DE and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer