84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

84X0.DE (iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc) and EL40.DE (Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF ) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - 84X0.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net) while EL40.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 84X0.DE returned 67.73% vs 47.15% for EL40.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 84X0.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EL40.DE.

Performance

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) and Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 84X0.DE achieves a 40.37% return, which is significantly higher than EL40.DE's 26.76% return.

84X0.DE

• 1D: -1.73%
• 1M: 5.67%
• YTD: 40.37%
• 6M: 42.72%
• 1Y: 67.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EL40.DE

• 1D: -2.26%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 26.76%
• 6M: 26.78%
• 1Y: 47.15%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
84X0.DE iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc	40.37%	19.85%	9.62%	7.38%
EL40.DE Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF	26.76%	17.86%	13.11%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between 84X0.DE and EL40.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	0.77

The correlation between 84X0.DE and EL40.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

84X0.DE

84X0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
84X0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
84X0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
84X0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 93
84X0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
84X0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

EL40.DE

EL40.DE Risk / Return Rank: 57
EL40.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EL40.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EL40.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 74
EL40.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EL40.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) and Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	84X0.DE	EL40.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	1.79	+1.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.51	2.56	+1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.64	1.43	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.88	2.88	+2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	7.00	+14.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 84X0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the EL40.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 84X0.DE and EL40.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	84X0.DE	EL40.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	1.79	+1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	0.30	+1.47

Drawdowns

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 84X0.DE drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum EL40.DE drawdown of -36.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 84X0.DE and EL40.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	84X0.DE	EL40.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-36.65%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.66%	-16.53%	+4.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.49%	-3.01%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.70%	-11.60%	+8.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	6.82%	-3.69%

Volatility

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (EL40.DE) at 8.00%. This indicates that 84X0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EL40.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	84X0.DE	EL40.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.41%	8.00%	+0.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.93%	15.83%	+1.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.46%	26.69%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.11%	20.75%	-3.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.11%	20.44%	-3.33%

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

84X0.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than EL40.DE's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

84X0.DE vs. EL40.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 84X0.DE nor EL40.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
84X0.DE iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EL40.DE Deka MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 84X0.DE and EL40.DE in my portfolio?

84X0.DE and EL40.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 84X0.DE or EL40.DE?

On fees, 84X0.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 84X0.DE or EL40.DE?

84X0.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for EL40.DE.

What is the main difference between 84X0.DE and EL40.DE?

84X0.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net), while EL40.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deka Investment GmbH. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for 84X0.DE and 0.66% for EL40.DE.