7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

7RIP.DE (HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF) and XUCD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - 7RIP.DE tracks the Solactive Travel while XUCD.DE tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 7RIP.DE returned 13.87%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for XUCD.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 7RIP.DE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUCD.DE.

Performance

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than XUCD.DE's 0.22% return.

7RIP.DE

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 6.39%
• YTD: -2.92%
• 6M: 2.26%
• 1Y: 11.78%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XUCD.DE

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.68%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 1.32%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 14.31%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
7RIP.DE HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF	-2.92%	5.32%	33.59%	26.46%	-14.00%	-9.48%
XUCD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D	0.22%	-5.02%	38.90%	39.32%	-34.77%	21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between 7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021	0.60

The correlation between 7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

7RIP.DE

7RIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 19
7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
7RIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
7RIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
7RIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
7RIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 18

XUCD.DE

XUCD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 18
XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
XUCD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
XUCD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XUCD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
XUCD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	7RIP.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.51	0.57	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	0.89	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.11	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.84	0.73	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.87	2.00	-0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is comparable to the XUCD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	7RIP.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51	0.57	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.67	-0.43

Drawdowns

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum XUCD.DE drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	7RIP.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.05%	-38.43%	+7.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.92%	-13.88%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.05%	-30.82%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.75%	-9.43%	+2.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.41%	-10.09%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.30%	5.09%	+1.21%

Volatility

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D (XUCD.DE) at 5.29%. This indicates that 7RIP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUCD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	7RIP.DE	XUCD.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	5.29%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.30%	13.18%	+5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.92%	17.94%	+4.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.99%	22.03%	+2.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.99%	21.90%	+3.09%

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XUCD.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

7RIP.DE vs. XUCD.DE - Dividend Comparison

7RIP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUCD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
7RIP.DE HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XUCD.DE Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1D	0.45%	0.46%	0.40%	0.90%	0.91%	0.35%	0.59%	0.81%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE in my portfolio?

7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 7RIP.DE or XUCD.DE?

On fees, XUCD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 7RIP.DE or XUCD.DE?

XUCD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for 7RIP.DE.

What is the main difference between 7RIP.DE and XUCD.DE?

7RIP.DE tracks Solactive Travel, while XUCD.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary 20/35 Custom. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for 7RIP.DE and 0.12% for XUCD.DE.