PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EMQQ.DE
HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF
-17.62%5.41%20.08%1.82%
ASWC.DE
HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR
3.89%38.30%39.36%14.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMQQ.DE achieves a -17.62% return, which is significantly lower than ASWC.DE's 3.89% return.


EMQQ.DE

1D
1.78%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
-17.62%
6M
-26.33%
1Y
-18.63%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
-12.27%
10Y*

ASWC.DE

1D
0.43%
1M
-6.18%
YTD
3.89%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMQQ.DE has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than ASWC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMQQ.DE
EMQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ASWC.DE
ASWC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMQQ.DEASWC.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.85

1.08

-1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.14

1.62

-2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.20

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

1.75

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.64

4.51

-6.15

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the ASWC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMQQ.DE and ASWC.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMQQ.DEASWC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

1.08

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.85

-1.77

Correlation

The correlation between EMQQ.DE and ASWC.DE is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither EMQQ.DE nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMQQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, which is greater than ASWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMQQ.DE and ASWC.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EMQQ.DEASWC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.94%

-12.58%

-55.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.66%

-12.58%

-16.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.48%

-9.16%

-47.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-2.26%

-33.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.93%

4.90%

+6.03%

Volatility

EMQQ.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF (EMQQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) at 6.29%. This indicates that EMQQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EMQQ.DEASWC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

6.29%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

15.47%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.77%

22.59%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.03%

18.91%

+12.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.93%

18.91%

+12.02%