7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE
7RIP.DE (HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF) and ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - 7RIP.DE is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Solactive Travel, while ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, 7RIP.DE returned 11.78% vs 17.13% for ASWC.DE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 7RIP.DE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ASWC.DE.
Performance
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than ASWC.DE's 13.04% return.
7RIP.DE
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- -2.92%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 11.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 8.16%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
7RIP.DE HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF | -2.92% | 5.32% | 33.59% | -0.64% |
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 13.04% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and ASWC.DE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2023 | 0.34 |
The correlation between 7RIP.DE and ASWC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
7RIP.DE
ASWC.DE
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 7RIP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.16 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 1.36 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.87 | 3.10 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 7RIP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | 0.84 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.91 | -1.66 |
Drawdowns
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, which is greater than ASWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and ASWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 7RIP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.05% | -12.58% | -18.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.92% | -12.58% | -1.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -2.83% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.41% | -2.47% | -6.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.30% | 5.51% | +0.79% |
Volatility
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) have volatilities of 6.05% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 7RIP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 5.89% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.30% | 15.89% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 20.35% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 19.12% | +5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 19.12% | +5.87% |
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ASWC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
7RIP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 7RIP.DE nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
7RIP.DE and ASWC.DE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASWC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASWC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for 7RIP.DE.
7RIP.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ASWC.DE is Aerospace & Defense. 7RIP.DE tracks Solactive Travel, while ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for 7RIP.DE and 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for 7RIP.DE and ASWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer