PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 7RIP.DE achieves a -2.92% return, which is significantly lower than 36BB.DE's -2.32% return.


7RIP.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
6.39%
YTD
-2.92%
6M
2.26%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
10Y*

36BB.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-2.32%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
7RIP.DE
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF
-2.92%5.32%33.59%26.46%-14.00%-9.48%
36BB.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
-2.32%-5.30%22.34%32.38%-29.45%14.67%

Correlation

The correlation between 7RIP.DE and 36BB.DE is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021

0.65

The correlation between 7RIP.DE and 36BB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

7RIP.DE
7RIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
7RIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

36BB.DE
36BB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
36BB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
36BB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) and iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


7RIP.DE36BB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.06

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.28

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

0.77

+1.10

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 7RIP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is higher than the 36BB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 7RIP.DE and 36BB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


7RIP.DE36BB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

0.26

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.43

-0.18

Drawdowns

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 7RIP.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.05%, smaller than the maximum 36BB.DE drawdown of -35.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 7RIP.DE and 36BB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


7RIP.DE36BB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.05%

-35.03%

+3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-15.07%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.05%

-27.35%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.75%

-11.48%

+4.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-10.96%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

5.59%

+0.71%

Volatility

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Volatility Comparison

HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF (7RIP.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist (36BB.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that 7RIP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


7RIP.DE36BB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

4.81%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.30%

12.73%

+5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.92%

16.71%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

19.44%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

20.85%

+4.14%

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

7RIP.DE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BB.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

7RIP.DE vs. 36BB.DE - Dividend Comparison

7RIP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36BB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36BB.DE
iShares MSCI World Consumer Discretionary Sector ESG UCITS ETF USD Dist
0.91%0.89%1.01%0.99%1.43%0.77%1.30%0.28%
7RIP.DE
HANetf The Travel UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


7RIP.DE and 36BB.DE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36BB.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36BB.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for 7RIP.DE.

7RIP.DE tracks Solactive Travel, while 36BB.DE tracks MSCI World Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for 7RIP.DE and 0.18% for 36BB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 7RIP.DE and 36BB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer