PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Dist (6TVL.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 6TVL.DE achieves a -8.10% return, which is significantly lower than QDVK.DE's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, 6TVL.DE has underperformed QDVK.DE with an annualized return of -1.08%, while QDVK.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.66% annualized return.


6TVL.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
2.73%
YTD
-8.10%
6M
-7.86%
1Y
-4.24%
3Y*
-4.77%
5Y*
-4.06%
10Y*
-1.08%

QDVK.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
9.79%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
9.12%
10Y*
12.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
6TVL.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Dist
-8.10%1.54%-4.24%21.08%-11.83%0.40%-15.62%20.36%-16.90%13.75%
QDVK.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
-0.11%-5.11%38.60%38.90%-33.82%35.49%20.84%31.88%3.58%7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between 6TVL.DE and QDVK.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.49

The correlation between 6TVL.DE and QDVK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

6TVL.DE
6TVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
6TVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6TVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
6TVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
6TVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
6TVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVK.DE
QDVK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
QDVK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Dist (6TVL.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


6TVL.DEQDVK.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.11

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

0.73

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

2.00

-2.65

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 6TVL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the QDVK.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 6TVL.DE and QDVK.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


6TVL.DEQDVK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

0.56

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.41

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.61

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.53

-0.24

Drawdowns

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 6TVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -55.51%, which is greater than QDVK.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6TVL.DE and QDVK.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


6TVL.DEQDVK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.51%

-37.28%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.82%

-13.65%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.26%

-30.81%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.62%

-37.28%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.51%

-37.28%

-18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.38%

-10.02%

-13.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.35%

-9.22%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

4.99%

+2.60%

Volatility

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Dist (6TVL.DE) is 5.06%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVK.DE) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that 6TVL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


6TVL.DEQDVK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

5.33%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

13.18%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.19%

17.90%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.43%

21.84%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.85%

20.62%

+5.23%

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

6TVL.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVK.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

6TVL.DE vs. QDVK.DE - Dividend Comparison

6TVL.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while QDVK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
6TVL.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Travel & Leisure UCITS ETF Dist
2.14%1.97%1.46%0.80%1.63%0.05%
QDVK.DE
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


6TVL.DE and QDVK.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVK.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVK.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for 6TVL.DE.

6TVL.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Travel & Leisure, while QDVK.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for 6TVL.DE and 0.15% for QDVK.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 6TVL.DE and QDVK.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer