6PSA.DE vs. CGVV
6PSA.DE (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) and CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. 6PSA.DE is passively managed, while CGVV is actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 6PSA.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for CGVV.
Performance
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
6PSA.DE is traded in EUR, while CGVV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CGVV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 6PSA.DE achieves a 16.30% return, which is significantly higher than CGVV's 12.38% return.
6PSA.DE
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 30.70%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
CGVV
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 11.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
6PSA.DE Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 16.30% | 12.18% |
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 12.38% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between 6PSA.DE and CGVV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV — Risk / Return Rank
6PSA.DE
CGVV
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (6PSA.DE) and Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 6PSA.DE | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.20 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 6PSA.DE | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 1.53 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 6PSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than CGVV's maximum drawdown of -7.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 6PSA.DE and CGVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 6PSA.DE | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.53% | -7.35% | -34.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.32% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -1.40% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | — | — |
Volatility
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 6PSA.DE | CGVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.11% | 13.36% | -3.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 13.36% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 13.36% | +4.49% |
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
6PSA.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than CGVV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
6PSA.DE vs. CGVV - Dividend Comparison
6PSA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than CGVV's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6PSA.DE Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.75% | 1.27% | 1.77% | 1.62% | 1.83% | 1.62% | 1.54% | 1.65% |
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
6PSA.DE and CGVV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for 6PSA.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for 6PSA.DE and 0.33% for CGVV.
Find the right allocation for 6PSA.DE and CGVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer