PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc (5UOA.DE) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1P.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5UOA.DE achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than PR1P.DE's 1.50% return.


5UOA.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
1.01%
YTD
1.02%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
2.19%
5Y*
1.37%
10Y*

PR1P.DE

1D
0.19%
1M
1.14%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.65%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
2.36%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
5UOA.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc
1.02%-4.01%7.93%4.48%-9.70%6.44%2.37%
PR1P.DE
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
1.50%-3.91%7.65%4.71%-10.23%6.47%1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between 5UOA.DE and PR1P.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.95

The correlation between 5UOA.DE and PR1P.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5UOA.DE
5UOA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
5UOA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5UOA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
5UOA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
5UOA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
5UOA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1P.DE
PR1P.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PR1P.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1P.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc (5UOA.DE) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1P.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5UOA.DEPR1P.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.11

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

1.03

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.46

2.57

-0.12

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5UOA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is comparable to the PR1P.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5UOA.DE and PR1P.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5UOA.DEPR1P.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.60

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.17

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.08

+0.06

Drawdowns

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5UOA.DE drawdown since its inception was -12.65%, smaller than the maximum PR1P.DE drawdown of -14.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5UOA.DE and PR1P.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5UOA.DEPR1P.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.65%

-14.46%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.32%

-3.57%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.22%

-11.79%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.65%

-13.45%

+0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-5.24%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.96%

-5.81%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.43%

-0.14%

Volatility

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc (5UOA.DE) is 1.10%, while Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1P.DE) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that 5UOA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1P.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5UOA.DEPR1P.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.24%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.94%

4.24%

-0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.70%

6.10%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.13%

8.34%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.18%

9.27%

-1.09%

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5UOA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1P.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

5UOA.DE vs. PR1P.DE - Dividend Comparison

5UOA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1P.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
5UOA.DE
iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PR1P.DE
Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)
4.67%4.74%4.35%4.15%4.21%3.32%3.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, 5UOA.DE and PR1P.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PR1P.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1P.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 5UOA.DE.

5UOA.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate Sustainable SRI, while PR1P.DE tracks Solactive USD Investment Grade Corporate. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 5UOA.DE and 0.05% for PR1P.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5UOA.DE and PR1P.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer