PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities (5SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5SPY.L achieves a 35.46% return, which is significantly lower than 3QQQ.L's 55.20% return.


5SPY.L

1D
0.00%
1M
22.23%
YTD
35.46%
6M
35.04%
1Y
119.12%
3Y*
55.62%
5Y*
10Y*

3QQQ.L

1D
-1.99%
1M
26.97%
YTD
55.20%
6M
49.56%
1Y
119.94%
3Y*
56.07%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
5SPY.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities
35.46%1.52%98.06%100.80%-52.48%
3QQQ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities
55.20%13.90%60.92%187.21%-56.66%

Correlation

The correlation between 5SPY.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2022

0.88

The correlation between 5SPY.L and 3QQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5SPY.L
5SPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
5SPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
5SPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

3QQQ.L
3QQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
3QQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities (5SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.39

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.49

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

5.31

+4.07

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5SPY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the 3QQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5SPY.L and 3QQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.89

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.59

-0.53

Drawdowns

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5SPY.L drawdown since its inception was -82.86%, which is greater than 3QQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -58.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5SPY.L and 3QQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.86%

-58.93%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.76%

-47.89%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.55%

-57.67%

-14.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-2.21%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.64%

-20.59%

-30.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.64%

22.48%

-9.84%

Volatility

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 5x Long US 500 ETP Securities (5SPY.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) have volatilities of 15.12% and 14.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5SPY.L3QQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.12%

14.43%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.00%

33.36%

+6.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.20%

63.01%

-7.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.23%

63.47%

+14.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.23%

63.47%

+14.76%

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5SPY.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

5SPY.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5SPY.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


5SPY.L and 3QQQ.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 3QQQ.L is cheaper at 0.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3QQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.01% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 5SPY.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 5SPY.L and 0.01% for 3QQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5SPY.L and 3QQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer