PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

5MVW.DE is traded in EUR, while XDW0.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XDW0.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 5MVW.DE having a 32.79% return and XDW0.L slightly lower at 32.41%.


5MVW.DE

1D
-0.61%
1M
3.30%
YTD
32.79%
6M
28.70%
1Y
44.89%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*

XDW0.L

1D
-0.71%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
32.41%
6M
29.14%
1Y
44.93%
3Y*
15.62%
5Y*
20.30%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
5MVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
32.79%2.17%7.57%0.01%54.20%52.29%-36.78%4.54%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
32.42%1.05%8.84%0.58%55.34%49.64%-36.13%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between 5MVW.DE and XDW0.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.95

The correlation between 5MVW.DE and XDW0.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5MVW.DE
5MVW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
5MVW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XDW0.L
XDW0.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


5MVW.DEXDW0.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.11

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

10.18

-0.37

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5MVW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the XDW0.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5MVW.DE and XDW0.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


5MVW.DEXDW0.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.18

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.83

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.37

+0.07

Drawdowns

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5MVW.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum XDW0.L drawdown of -61.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5MVW.DE and XDW0.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5MVW.DEXDW0.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.87%

-61.46%

+4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-14.40%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.76%

-24.02%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

-24.02%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.49%

-7.26%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-13.95%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

4.40%

+0.16%

Volatility

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (5MVW.DE) is 6.76%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.L) has a volatility of 7.89%. This indicates that 5MVW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDW0.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5MVW.DEXDW0.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

7.89%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

17.29%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

20.54%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.99%

24.32%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.20%

26.25%

+2.95%

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

5MVW.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDW0.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

5MVW.DE vs. XDW0.L - Dividend Comparison

5MVW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, while XDW0.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
5MVW.DE
iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.48%3.29%3.54%3.64%3.41%3.49%5.08%0.63%
XDW0.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, 5MVW.DE and XDW0.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 5MVW.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

5MVW.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.L.

5MVW.DE tracks MSCI World Energy, while XDW0.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for 5MVW.DE and 0.25% for XDW0.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5MVW.DE and XDW0.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer