PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5MVL.DE achieves a 46.85% return, which is significantly higher than UBUS.DE's 9.37% return.


5MVL.DE

1D
2.38%
1M
8.72%
YTD
46.85%
6M
51.96%
1Y
81.19%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
17.75%
10Y*

UBUS.DE

1D
0.89%
1M
4.21%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.60%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
10.48%
5Y*
9.53%
10Y*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
46.85%27.25%21.00%14.59%-10.56%13.09%-2.40%20.36%-14.02%
UBUS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
9.37%0.40%13.97%12.38%-2.90%41.54%-3.81%33.57%-11.36%

Correlation

The correlation between 5MVL.DE and UBUS.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

5MVL.DE
5MVL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
5MVL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

UBUS.DE
UBUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


5MVL.DEUBUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.29

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.30

3.26

+5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.93

10.48

+15.45

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 5MVL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.02, which is higher than the UBUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 5MVL.DE and UBUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5MVL.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.22%, which is greater than UBUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5MVL.DE and UBUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


5MVL.DEUBUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.22%

-30.27%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.73%

-6.12%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.14%

-21.83%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.60%

-21.83%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

0.00%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-5.09%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

1.91%

+1.21%

Volatility

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (5MVL.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.80% compared to UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UBUS.DE) at 2.65%. This indicates that 5MVL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBUS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


5MVL.DEUBUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

2.65%

+6.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.08%

8.00%

+9.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.14%

11.81%

+8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

14.73%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

15.84%

+3.52%

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5MVL.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than UBUS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

5MVL.DE vs. UBUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

5MVL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UBUS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
5MVL.DE
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUS.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Factor MSCI USA Prime Value UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.13%1.24%0.67%1.52%1.62%1.56%1.89%1.30%1.93%1.60%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


5MVL.DE and UBUS.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UBUS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 5MVL.DE.

5MVL.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UBUS.DE is Large Cap Value Equities. 5MVL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Select Value Factor Focus, while UBUS.DE tracks MSCI USA Prime Value. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 5MVL.DE and 0.25% for UBUS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 5MVL.DE and UBUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer